Showing posts with label pronunciation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pronunciation. Show all posts

20100304

016 : Poking Fun at English

'Confusing the enemy' by werewegian.

Can you pronounce all of the names of places in the above picture? ;)

English is a highly evolving language, as it is affected by other languages into its vocabulary, sound system etc as its number of speakers continue to grow. This is partially also because the cultural divide between English and non-English speakers is getting smaller.

This, of course, is a subject of a lot of debate, as well as plenty of confusion (and hilarity) in the use of the language.

Some time ago, I found an Anonymous poem on why English is so difficult to master for both native and non-native speakers. It really made me laugh out loud.

For your own enjoyment/enlightenment, here it is:

We’ll begin with a box, and the plural is boxes,
But the plural of ox should be oxen, not oxes.
Then one fowl is a goose, but two are called geese,
Yet the plural of mouse should never be meese,
You may find a lone mouse or a whole nest of mice,
But the plural of house is houses, not hice.

If the plural of man is always called men,
Why shouldn’t the plural of pan be called pen?
The cow in the plural may be cows or kine,
But a bow if repeated is never called bine,
And the plural of vow is vows, never vine.

If I speak of a foot and you show me your feet,
And I give you a boot would a pair be called beet?
If one is a tooth, and a whole set are teeth,
Why shouldn’t the plural of booth be called beeth?

If the singular’s this and the plural is these,
Should the plural of kiss ever be nicknamed keese?
Then one may be that and three would be those,
Yet hat in the plural would never be hose,
And the plural of cat is cats, not cose.

We speak of a brother, and also of brethren,
But though we say mother, we never say methren,
Then the masculine pronouns are he, his and him,
But imagine the feminine she, shis and shim,

So the English, I think, you all will agree,
Is the queerest language you ever did see.

There is a similarly amusing poem, but this may be a lot more confusing. And much much longer. It was written in the early 1900s by Gerard Nolst Trenité. Here is an excerpt:

Dearest creature in creation
Studying English pronunciation,
I will teach you in my verse
Sounds like corpse, corps, horse and worse.

I will keep you, Susy, busy,
Make your head with heat grow dizzy;
Tear in eye, your dress you’ll tear;
Queer, fair seer, hear my prayer.
Pray, console your loving poet,
Make my coat look new, dear, sew it!
Just compare heart, hear and heard,
Dies and diet, lord and word.
Sword and sward, retain and Britain
(Mind the latter how it’s written).

Made has not the sound of bade,
Say — said, pay — paid, laid but plaid.
Now I surely will not plague you
With such words as vague and ague,
But be careful how you speak,
Say: gush, bush, steak, streak, break, bleak,
Previous, precious, fuchsia, via,
Recipe, pipe, studding-sail, choir;
Woven, oven, how and low,
Script, receipt, shoe, poem, toe.

Say, expecting fraud and trickery:
Daughter, laughter and Terpsichore,
Branch, ranch, measles, topsails, aisles,
Missiles, similes, reviles.
Wholly, holly, signal, signing,
Same, examining, but mining,
Scholar, vicar, and cigar,
Solar, mica, war and far.
From “desire”: desirable — admirable from “admire”,
Lumber, plumber, bier, but brier,
Topsham, brougham, renown, but known,
Knowledge, done, lone, gone, none, tone,
One, anemone, Balmoral,
Kitchen, lichen, laundry, laurel.

I copied both of these poems from World Wide Words, a site for 'international English'. The poems can be found on this page.

Here's An Idea!

Aside from providing comic relief for the students, you can use these poems as a teaching material eg. lessons on pronunciation, spelling, plurality, learning about homophones/homographs/homonyms, and even on literature (or more specifically poetry)! They might be more suitable for intermediate levels and beyond however, as too many near-words studied together may confuse learners.

Have fun :)

20091111

015 : Lie versus Lay

How can you tell?

Well here's when you gotta bring out the big ol' Grammar Book back to refer to, because there IS a difference,  not just in spelling but also pronunciation. It's also important to note the overlaps of these words in certain tenses, which makes it even more confusing.

First, it's important to know that lay is a Transitive Verb (TransV) while lie is an Intransitive Verb (IntransV). This means that lay requires a Direct Object (DO = something the action is done to) while lie (except for the meaning of 'telling untruths', for which a DO is optional) does not.

Verb          Infinitive       Past Tense      Past Participle
lie               lie                  lay                   lain
lay             lay                  laid                  laid 



Here are some altered examples of sentences using these, from Grammar Girl.

Blue = Lie, Pink = Lay, Yellow = Direct Object.

The present tense of lie and lay are rather easy to distinguish:
You lay down the sheets of paper.
You lie on the floor.

The past tense of lie is lay, so
Last week, Steve lay down on the floor.
The cat lay in the mud after it rained yesterday.

The past tense of lay is laid, so
Last week, I laid the TPS report on your desk.
Mary forcefully laid her ring on the table.

The past participle of lie is lain, so
Steve has lain on the floor for days.
The cat has lain in the mud for hours.

The past participle of lay is laid, so
I have laid the TPS report on your desk.
Mary has forcefully laid her ring on the table.

 This is just a simple account of the issue. For more information, please refer to these sites (aka my sources):

Cheers and have fun with grammar. ;P